Shakespeare: Assignment

Michael Delahoyde
Washington State University


Here’s outrageous fortune: you have several options for this assignment which can both appeal to your own individual talents and still allow you to package brilliant scholarly analysis in impressive and professional ways.

1) THE PAPER:an eight-to-ten-page manuscript.
The typical weakness with such papers is the too general nature in the discussions of the topics. The weak mind thinks that selection of some vast subject such as “love” will allow for superficial discussion of four plays slapped together to fill the required pages. Such a project, and its resultant grade, will suck.

Be conscientious, nay ruthless, in focusing your scope and in exploring implications. Find a specific moment, subtle motif, or character issue. Why is this one observation or insight of yours significant in the larger framework of the play?

You are required this time to research and include secondary sources, but original insight and analysis should still dominate the entire discussion. Your final revised essay must be a minimum of eight full, typed, double-spaced pages containing an intriguing (not underlined) title, an original unified thesis, vigorous analytical work, no extra spaces between paragraphs, all in a clean, effective, illuminating, properly documented presentation (correctly punctuated in-text parenthetical citations of author and page, and a correctly formatted MLA-style Works Cited list). For further instruction regarding documentation, refer to the hand-out given with the previous assignment, or to the web page, or ask me ahead of time. Proofread well so that minor surface matters do not distract readers from your ideas. The grade for any manuscript lacking a Works Cited list or containing a renegade, variant, or insane documentation system will strike you as intensely disappointing.

2) ALTERNATE PROJECT:you tell me.
I welcome other kinds of projects that demonstrate the same objectives that the paper does: ability to carry out sophisticated research, to discover an original purpose and focus, to write with clarity and influence your audience’s perspective. You may find a way to construct a bibliographical, filmic, pedagogical, or popular culture related project appropriate to Shakespeare studies which will inspire enthusiasm and break new ground impressively. You may work on a cooperative endeavor with a colleague. There are many possibilities. Think about it.

You may work alone or with someone else creating a useful resource for current and future students of Shakespeare. Realize that this is a scholarly project, not an advertisement or fan page. Pick an appropriately manageable scope for the project and include all the key ingredients that you would provide for a paper: research, analysis, commentary, and whatever else would make this creation impressive and valuable. And then package this in ways appropriate for a web site (research gets registered in a Works Cited that may include hyperlinks, for example) and for an audience consisting of future students of this class. Do not just create a recycling dumpsite, that is, don’t replicate what’s already available. Instead, be sure to offer the one thing most lacking on the web: critical analysis — not a full paper’s worth, since that just invites plagiarism, but some sophisticated components of commentary.

If you choose this project because it seems easy and you think you can submit any old crap with a jpg of that bald Stratford dolt, you are doomed and will fail most miserably. If you take up this challenge heroically and meaningfully, it will show.

You will need to turn in a one-paragraph project proposal which commits you to one of the above options, even though your focus within the project may change.

Sample papers, good to excellent, are available on this web site, as are instructions and examples for the required MLA-style documentation.

I am glad to provide advice and help at any stage, from pre-writing and researching to the drafting, of this project. Ultimately, though, it must be completed and turned in when due; the compressed schedule of late semester does not allow for screwing around and cheesy excuses.